Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP) Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024

Effects shown in research

Child health

Findings rated moderate

Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Infant death < 1 year

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
One year following birth Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2009-2012 birth cohort 126880 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.01 Unadjusted proportion = 0.01 OR = 0.73 HomVEE calculated = -0.19 Statistically significant, p < 0.01
Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Program and comparison group proportions are less than 0.010. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Infant death < 28 days
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
28 days following birth Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2009-2012 birth cohort 126880 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 OR = 0.70 HomVEE calculated = -0.22 Statistically significant, p < 0.01
Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Program and comparison group proportions are less than 0.005. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Infant death 28-365 days
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
One year following birth Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2009-2012 birth cohort 126880 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.00 OR = 0.78 HomVEE calculated = -0.15 Statistically significant, p = 0.02
Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Program and comparison group proportions are less than 0.005. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Low birth weight (<2500g)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Immediately post-intervention Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2010 birth cohort 32088 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.08 Unadjusted proportion = 0.09 OR = 0.91 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Preterm birth (<37 weeks)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Immediately post-intervention Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2010 birth cohort 32088 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 OR = 0.91 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Very low birth weight (<1500g)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Immediately post-intervention Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2010 birth cohort 32088 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.01 Unadjusted proportion = 0.02 OR = 0.71 HomVEE calculated = -0.21 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Very preterm birth (<32 weeks)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Immediately post-intervention Full sample; Michigan Medicaid 2010 birth cohort 32088 infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.02 Unadjusted proportion = 0.03 OR = 0.80 HomVEE calculated = -0.14 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

View Revisions